Do Women Like Genitile Hair Of Men?

Who is a painter who model and gallery visitors who?

By Stefan Sasse

A rather idiosyncratic analysis of Guttenberg's resignation Thomas Steg, a former deputy government spokesman narrated from 2002 to 2009, in an article in the Süddeutsche. Accordingly, Guttenberg was a victim of trying to shape his image in the media for his own ideas of what can not work, according to Steg. Celebrity-known example for this thesis in his Rudolf Scharping, who could never get rid of his boring image, no matter what he tried. According to bar a politician can only go through an image transformation when it was "credible and authentic" remains - bridge example is Joschka Fischer. The article ends with a list of current politicians, and to them of "the people" attributed attributes. come alone, in bars "" the people "(a terrible fashion collection word) to their assessments of politicians such as the Virgin Mary for the child.

The very few people ever have a leading politician seen live, much less are met him in person or knew him before his ascent. A large part "of the people" does not even have a direct question of any top politician on TV or radio experience. I can remember, for example, not to have experienced ever Aigner, Ramsauer or young in the original sound. When creating the image of a politician is, the overwhelming majority "of people" rely on intermediaries. Of these mediators, there are two: first, the media, and the other, the parties themselves, the latter usually occur only during the campaign directly to the citizens approached. In the remaining three and a half years, they mainly focus on influencing the media, so they report in their favor - the government officials come here an elementary Role.

In bridge there are these two links in the chain is not easy. "The people" are simply an opinion about politicians, then this is sacrosanct - Lafontaine evil, arrogant Westerwelle, Steinmeier solid and calm, Gabriel suddenly, von der Leyen pretty and competent, diligent de Maizière. Such images, however, can ultimately only be conveyed through the media, because the absolute majority of Germans gathers information through newspaper, radio and television about the political process and relies on the basic reporting. Who could seriously an attribution like "hard worker" in the case de Maizières take themselves out of watching his public appearances? For something we need journalists who know him and have long observed - or simply write the attribute

Either way, the images of politicians are not actually painted by themselves.. They are the model and the final product is in the hands of the painter. And these are not the citizens, which are only gallery visitors. The painters are the media and the spin doctors who try to influence it. To act as if a magical connection between politicians and citizens would be, is simply disingenuous.